jump to navigation

Presentation: Energy Efficiency Action Planning in ASEAN region November 11, 2011

Posted by benisuryadi in Activity, Energy Efficiency, Presentation, Y2011.
Tags:
add a comment

As I shared you before, I joined as the speaker and panelist in two session on ASEAN Regional Energy Efficiency Policy Dialogue and Capacity Building Workshop, on 18-20 October 2011 in Jakarta, Indonesia that organized by IPEEC-WEACT subtask and the IEA.

SESSION I: Action Planning for energy efficiency.

Ron Benioff, Manager, International Programmes, NREL shared about the Overview: action planning goals, approaches, and examples (I shared already the information 1-2), Grayson Heffner, Senior Energy Efficiency Advisor, IEA presented Case Study: action planning in the EU, and myself presented Energy efficiency action planning in ASEAN region.

To that, I am pleased to share with you my presentation. I hope you find this information useful.

You may find the complete presentations from all speakers at IEA page here or go to IPEEC webpage (but you need to log in for this).

Handout on Energy Efficiency Energy Action Plan Approaches and Resources (Part 2) October 26, 2011

Posted by benisuryadi in Activity, Energy Efficiency, Y2011.
Tags:
3 comments

An Energy Efficiency Action Plan (EEAP) is developed through a multi-step process.  The following guidelines for EEAP development present potential steps and considerations based on the experience of energy efficiency action plans from around the world, with resources identified for further information.  This document is based in part on the IEA’s Energy Efficiency Governance Handbook, 2010. (http://www.iea.org/papers/2010/gov_handbook.pdf)

Part 2 of 2.

Step 6: Distribution of Responsibilities and Accountability: Specific action items (i.e., the implementation of policies and programs) must be assigned and integrated into current sector level programs and plans.  Also, it is important to establish accountability for the plan’s effectiveness.  Centralized accountability may simplify plan management and facilitate better coordination and evaluation. Conversely, distributed accountability engages a wider community in support of the plan by expanding ownership of policy and program impacts.

Step 7: Circulation, Discussion, and Refinement of the Energy Efficiency Action Plan.  Draft plans should be broadly shared for review by key government policymakers and business and NGO stakeholders.  This will both help determine whether adjustments may be needed to strengthen the EAAP and will also build support of these stakeholders for plan implementation.    (more…)

Handout on Energy Efficiency Energy Action Plan Approaches and Resources (Part 1) October 23, 2011

Posted by benisuryadi in Activity, Energy Efficiency, Y2011.
Tags: ,
3 comments

A friend of mine, Mr. Ron Beniof from U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory prepared a Handout on Energy Efficiency Energy Action Plan Approaches and Resources for IPEEC/WEACT ASEAN Regional Energy Efficiency Workshop that was held on 18-20 October 2011 in Jakarta.

Indeed, it’s a short but comprehensive information on how we should develop the Energy Efficiency Action Plan. With his permission, I am pleased to share it with you.

Here is the part 1 of 2.

An Energy Efficiency Action Plan (EEAP) is developed through a multi-step process.  The following guidelines for EEAP development present potential steps and considerations based on the experience of energy efficiency action plans from around the world, with resources identified for further information.  This document is based in part on the IEA’s Energy Efficiency Governance Handbook, 2010.

(http://www.iea.org/papers/2010/gov_handbook.pdf)

Step 1: Stakeholder Engagement:  Active stakeholder participation is essential to ensure that both a high quality plan is developed and that strong and enduring support is secured for plan implementation.

Fukushima Report : No.4 October 15, 2011

Posted by benisuryadi in 01 - Daily Short.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Just received the Fukushima Report No 4.

It’s been a while since I received the Fukhushima Report No.3 from Japanese WEC Member Committees. And, it has passed six months since a magnitude-9 earthquake and an ensuing tsunami inflicted devastating damage on northeastern Japan on March 11.

The earthquake caused three nuclear reactors that were in operation at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station to be shut down as a safety mechanism through the emergency insertion of control rods, which halted the nuclear chain reaction. The giant tsunami, more than 14 meters high, subsequently struck the nuclear power station, causing the loss of all auxiliary power sources, including emergency backups.

In this 4th report, some key information that you’ll find are:

1. Overview

(1) 6 months since 3.11 : Key points of the accident, Disposal of massive radioactive water, and Roadmap toward stabilizing the accident.

(2) Recent situation of the damaged nuclear power station

(3) Surrounding areas: Worries are growing with progress in monitoring

2. Recent electric power supply and developments related to energy policy

(1) New cabinet and energy debate

(2) Restriction on the usage of electricity and request for electricity conservation

(3) Tough stance of the heads of host communities

(4) Public opinions: Opinion polls, Crossroads in national debate and expectations for the new government.

Thanks to KNI-WEC and Japanese WEC Member Committees for the continuous update. As we know, every one is continuous looking at this.

Link: Report 1, Report 2, Report 3.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.